Re: Models with parents and heterotic groups

Dear Arthur

I tried what you suggested, that is to say:

Parent1 !A 845
Parent2 !AS Parent1
GrHet1 *
GrHet2 *
Plantes 1
Recolte 1
Recolte !BINOMIAL !LOGIT !TOTAL Plantes ~ mu Environnement,
!r GrHet1 and(GrHet2) Parent1 and Parent2 # "and" is like "+" ????
predict Parent1 !present GrHet1
predict Parent2 !present GrHet2

I obtained a R² between predicted and observed value of 0.78.

I expected to get 2 parts in the .pvs file (because of the 2 "predict" statments), but I get only 1 part. Why?

A lot of the predicted values in the .pvs file are the same. I don't know if I should expect that.

Moreover, I compared the .pvs of this model to the .pvs of

Recolte !BINOMIAL !LOGIT !TOTAL Plantes ~ mu Environnement,
!r Parent2 -Parent1 and(Parent1)
predict Parent1
--> Model M0

The results are poorly correlated.

Then I tried

Parent1 !A 845
Parent2 !AS Parent1
GrHet1 *
GrHet2 *
Plantes 1
Recolte 1
Recolte !BINOMIAL !LOGIT !TOTAL Plantes ~ mu Environnement,
!r GrHet1 and(GrHet2) Parent1 and(Parent2)
predict Parent1 !present GrHet1

I obtained a R² between predicted and observed value of 0.71. But the results were more consistent with M0 (whose R² is 0.76).

...
Have a nice day,

Chloe

-------------------- m2f --------------------

Sent using Mail2Forum (http://www.mail2forum.com).

Read this topic online here:
http://www.vsni.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?p=930#930

-------------------- m2f --------------------
Received on Thu Oct 14 2009 - 16:43:51 EST