Hello all,
I have just changed to ASReml 2 and am having a small problem with my
animal models - specifically I keep getting an extra "variance" term
reported. I've just run a few simple univariate models and this seems to
only occur if I actually include the variance model. So for example;
y ~ mu !r animal
Gives me Va and a residual variance as expected but,
y ~ mu !r animal
1 1 1
0 0 ID 0.35
ANIMAL 1
ANIMAL 0 ID 0.02
Gives me e.g.
Source Model terms Gamma Component Comp/SE % C
Variance 5571 5562 1.00000 3.37476 0.00
0 S
Residual identity 5571 0.111444 0.376097 39.74
0 U
ANIMAL Ainverse 10044 0.544778E-02 0.183850E-01 2.79
0 U
The problem being the extra, unexpected "variance" component.I checked
the updated part of the manual but couldn't work out what I'm doing
wrong. Has the coding of the variance model changed or am I just
missing something obvious? Any thoughts would be very welcome.
Alastair
-- Alastair J Wilson PhD Postdoctoral Research Fellow Alastair.Wilson_at_ed.ac.uk tel. 0131 6507287 Institute of Evolutionary Biology School of Biological Sciences The University of Edinburgh Ashworth Laboratories The King's Buildings West Mains Road Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UKReceived on Sat Sep 18 2006 - 18:13:11 EST
This webpage is part of the ASReml-l discussion list archives 2004-2010. More information on ASReml can be found at the VSN website. This discussion list is now deprecated - please use the VSN forum for discussion on ASReml. (These online archives were generated using the hypermail package.)