Dear ASREMLers,
Can someone please throw some light on the following ASREML
prediction:
I have a model predicting variety means using code:
yield ~ mu c(Varname) c(tos) c(Year) c(Newzone),
!r TrialID
1 1 0 !WT=nrep
0 0 0
predict Varname
The predicted variety means are all exactly 62 kgs lower than those from
GENSTAT.
However, the raw mean is 2347 (which I presume GENSTAT adjusts to,
BUT ASREML estimates mu=2421
So, strangely, the ASREML overall mean is HIGHER???
than GENSTAT.
Peter Clarke
--
Asreml mailinglist archive: http://www.chiswick.anprod.csiro.au/lists/asreml