Hello all,
I have a question regarding the wisdom of fitting a random regression
model of fecundity (scored as 0 or 1) in a human data set where
fecundity has been scored annually for several hundred women for each
year of their life (from 16-50 I think). I have fitted the two models
below and get apparently sensible results from the second of these in
which I wanted to test for a genotype by age interaction.
fec !binary ~ mu fixedFX !r leg(ageS,0).ANIMAL leg(ageS,0).ide(ANIMAL)
fec !binary ~ mu fixedFX !r leg(ageS,1).ANIMAL leg(ageS,1).ide(ANIMAL
However, I'm also aware that there are issues relating to the use of
generalised animal models, and was wondering if anyone had views on
whether this was valid? Also, if the approach is not inherently wrong,
is there any way to statistically compare these models if, as I
understand, the likelihoods should not be used for model comparison.
Best wishes,
Alastair
-- Alastair J Wilson NERC Research Fellow Alastair.Wilson_at_ed.ac.uk http://wildevolution.biology.ed.ac.uk/index.html http://wildevolution.biology.ed.ac.uk/awilson/index.html tel. 0131 6513608 Institute of Evolutionary Biology School of Biological Sciences The University of Edinburgh Ashworth Laboratories The King's Buildings West Mains Road Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UKReceived on Fri Jan 22 2008 - 15:36:08 EST
This webpage is part of the ASReml-l discussion list archives 2004-2010. More information on ASReml can be found at the VSN website. This discussion list is now deprecated - please use the VSN forum for discussion on ASReml. (These online archives were generated using the hypermail package.)