Re: Interpretation of Components for Splines
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Interpretation of Components for Splines



>The component for spl(time) is a variance component, but it controls the
>amount of smoothing. If this component (actually the ratio gamma) tends 
>to zero, the spline fit tends to a straight line, as it gets large the 
>fit tends to interpolation. The additional variance component, ie 
>dev(time), allows for the presence of group effects, and can only be 
>fitted if there is replication at each (or most) time point. This is in 
>line with the usual one-way random effects analysis where you would fit 
>y~ mu !r group
>in asreml to get correct analysis ie estimating both an error and between 
>groups variance.
>
>The usual roughness penalty that is described in most smoothing texts is 
>actually lambda = 1/gamma(spl).

Thank you for your remarks. As you know, it is customary to specify
heritability as a function of the genetic and total variability. In
formulating linear functions of the variance components, should the
components for spl(time) and dev(time) be considered a part of the total
variability or should one include them in the genetic variation?

Peter /
>...........................................................................
....
>      Brian Cullis                       Tel: 02 6938 1855
>      NSW Agriculture                    Fax: 02 6938 1809
>      Wagga Agricultural Institute     email: brian.cullis@agric.nsw.gov.au
>      Pine Gully Rd
>      WAGGA WAGGA  NSW 2650

--
Asreml mailinglist archive: http://www.chiswick.anprod.csiro.au/lists/asreml